With cloud migration, services are distributed over the internet and in remote data centers—so that innovation can be enabled more quickly. Resources can be provisioned with greater flexibility, and economies of scale can be achieved.
Multiple data centers are used by cloud providers like Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS). In addition, cloud computing is based on two methods that enable standardization and cost efficiency, these are resource sharing and a pay-as-you-go model.
Simply put, cloud computing allows users to rent their IT infrastructure rather than purchase it. Instead of investing heavily in databases, software, and hardware, customers use services like AWS and Azure to access computational power via the internet and pay as they use it.
Azure Vs. AWS: Key Differences
Cloud kings Azure and AWS are both well-recognized and both fighting for dominance in the cloud sector while revolutionizing the IT world. According to current statistics, AWS accounts for 41.5% of all installed application workloads, while Azure accounts for 29.4%. Another competitor, Google Cloud Platform (GCP), has a 3% share, contributing to the AWS vs. Azure debate.
AWS provides serverless services such as Amazon Kinesis Streams, Amazon SQS Queues, and AWS Lambda Functions for smooth and flexible data collection. In addition to computing, database, content delivery, and storage services, AWS also offers Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS).
On the other hand, Azure offers computing, networking, data management databases, and performance services—and developers can use the Azure Machine Learning Studio to write, test, and deploy algorithms.
When it comes to availability in regions, there are 22 geographic regions and 14 data centers within Amazon Web Service. In total, there are over 114 edge locations and 12 regional edge caches. Meanwhile, there are 54 regions in Microsoft Azure, each with at least three availability zones and 116 edge locations.
When comparing AWS with Azure, AWS offers a Linux and Windows product marketplace, while Azure has a limited Linux ecosystem despite having a large partner network. To determine which is best for your business, let’s take a closer look at their features and services.
Storage Options in the Cloud
Having adequate storage is essential for the cloud deployment of organizations. It is important to note that Azure and AWS have almost equal strengths in this area—however, their offerings are vastly different. While the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3), Elastic Block Store (EBS), and Glacier are available through Amazon Web Services, Azure Storage Services provides disk storage, blob storage, and standard archives.
With AWS S3, customers can benefit from scalable, secure, and robust storage solutions for structured and unstructured big data. The Azure platform, on the other hand, offers data storage options such as Azure Blogs, Azure Queues, Azure Disks, Azure Tables, and Azure Files.
In both cases, the number of permissible objects is unlimited. There are, however, 5TB of object size restrictions on AWS, while 4.75TB are available in Azure.
Data Protection and Security
When it comes to ensuring enhanced privacy, AWS selects secure options and settings by default. Microsoft Azure uses its Cloud Defender service for security and data privacy—an artificial intelligence-powered solution that safeguards against new threats as they emerge.
The Azure platform may, however, not be 100% secure by default, such as deploying virtual machine instances with all ports open unless otherwise configured.
Licensing and License Mobility
It is important for Azure and AWS to ensure that customers don’t have to worry about licensing hassles or license mobility concerns. With both services adopting pay-as-you-go pricing structures, customers are only charged for the services they use. If they have already paid for the service, they are eligible for license mobility in Microsoft Azure.
While Azure is easier for Windows administrators to set up, AWS offers more features and is more customizable. When comparing AWS and Azure, it’s clear that most of the services are identical.
Azure, however, offers more Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) features than AWS. Among them are Azure Scheduler, Azure Site Recovery, Azure Visual Studio Online, and Azure Event Hubs. Amazon Web Services, however, seems to lead when it comes to flexibility, adaptability to the open-source community, and revenue generation.
Database Services Capacities
These two solutions support both structured and unstructured information, as well as big data. AWS users can take advantage of Amazon RDS for durable data management, whereas Azure users can use Azure SQL server for database management.
Comparing AWS vs Azure, AWS provides a relatively mature environment for handling big data. Neither system has a problem working with relational databases nor not only SQL (NoSQL) databases. These storage solutions are widely available, long-lasting, and provide simple, automatic replication.
Even though AWS offers more instance types, Azure’s tooling and interface are very straightforward to use, making it easy to complete multiple database tasks.
In terms of pricing, AWS and Azure both offer reasonable rates and a pay-as-you-go pricing option. Moreover, both providers offer free introductory packages to show users how their systems can integrate with on-premises applications. On AWS, instances are priced hourly and can be purchased in the following ways:
- On-demand – Utilize only the services and resources you need
- Spot – Request for extra capacity availability
- Reserved – Pay upfront to reserve an instance for up to three years
On the other hand, Azure charges per minute, so users have a more specific pricing component than AWS. Additionally, there are options for short-term commitments to choose between prepaid and monthly charges. Subscriptions on Azure for a short period of time offer greater flexibility.
In addition to this, pricing for Microsoft Azure using BT MPLS ExpressRoute is available, allowing you to extend your private corporate network into the cloud with the appropriate functionality.
However, comparing the two options, Azure is usually more expensive and can increase a company’s cloud costs. One example of this is the cost of Azure instances that increase as they grow in size. An Azure server configured with 256GB RAM and 64vPCUs will cost nearly twice as much as an AWS server.
Is AWS or Azure Better for Your Organization?
With AWS vs. Azure, in comparison, we’re trying to determine which cloud platform is the best. AWS may look better overall, but your organization’s specific needs might make Azure the better choice for you. Thus, in this cloud war, there is no clear winner. In the end, it all depends on what your company needs.
Ultimately, AWS and Azure are both leading companies with the best products and services. The only thing you need from now on is a competent cloud provider to open up the whole world of cloud opportunities for you.
With Laminar Consulting, our team will recommend the best cloud services solution depending on the needs of your business development. Additionally, we ensure a smooth post-migration process with our cloud migration services. You can email us at firstname.lastname@example.org or by calling us at 888-531-9995 at Laminar Consulting today!
Share this Article: